Introduction

Note: Much of this blog is old and may be outdated.

About me:

• Iris
• minor

My social media:

• Tumblr: aronarchy
• Instagram: aronarcha
• AO3: aronarchy
• NNIA: aronarchy, aronarchist

Discourse stances:

• anarcha-communist
• anti radfem, anti TERF, anti SWERF
• tucute
• radical inclusionist
  • all aspecs are LGBTQ+ unless they don’t personally identify with the label/community
  • all people who identify with the label “LGBTQ+”/“queer” as part of their identity in good faith are LGBTQ+/queer
  • pro MOGAI
  • pro mspec lesbians/gays
  • pro xenogenders & neopronouns
  • all good-faith identity labels are valid
  • labels don’t have to 100% accurately describe who you are; they exist to make people comfortable, and their definitions can change
  • nondysphoric trans people exist; transmeds are science-deniers
• anti bigotry (including racism, queermisia, ageism, etc.)
• proship
  • anti harassment (criticism =/= harassment)
  • anti FAIA
    • radically anti-censorship (including bigoted fiction—deplatforming =/= censorship)
    • against “asking people for consent to write RPF about them” without prior consent (for obvious reasons). pro nonconsensual RPF if the subject has a near-zero risk of finding it. not sure what exactly I would consider sufficient to constitute near-zero risk, whether if the subject deliberately searches for it and can find it that would be ok/not ok, whether there should be different rules applied to art as opposed to writing, etc. current stance somewhere along the lines of “writing in private ok, DMs ok, publishing on publicly accessible forums not ok, AO3’s current stance on it not ok.” still trying to figure it out when I do bother to think about it, which is almost never (anymore), I no longer participate much if at all in the discourse and don’t find it particularly important to me.
  • anti-thoughtcrime
    • pro kodocon
    • pro map
    • pro paraphilia